I can accept the idea that pilots of passenger

Risk taking is good but not callous risks. Similarly for other so felt advantages of scans. Human thoughts which evolve from time to time do determine actions we take positive or negative. How attitudes develop depends on our surrounding environment…it is all so complex that a laboratory testing is not at all enough. It could lead to disaster afterall.

SHANN TURNBULL PRINCIPAL INTERNATIONAL

We have to deal with human beings and not robots who may be develop in accordance with what brain scans tell us. DR SHADRECK SAILI Good observation Prof. My argument is that any method that can be us to refine the identification of a perfect fit Cayman Islands Phone Number List personel for a particular assignment is naturally welcome and as a globe we are moving in the direction of refining such methods. Over the years for instance we have been using methods to understand actions of persons generat by their brains and manifest through behavour patterns. Such methods may include interviews aptitute test etc. But the question is how refin are they to procure a resource you would term a naturally good worker.

I would further argue that in essence all

Other methods we use seem to be part of neuromanagement and has exist all along even before Professor Qingguo propos it in in this context. INSTITUTE FOR SELF GOVERNANCE planes and astronauts should have brain scans to identify Philippine Whatsapp Number neurological risks like aneurisms that could lead to a stroke. But I would counsel against using brain scans to select for behavioural attributes. This is because social animals like humans have hard wir into them contrary characteristics like being competitive cooperative selfish generous suspicious trusting and so on. Not as expensive but continually testing the limits of our reaction to stimuli which we may have or may not have felt before or would like to feel again A point to note. This new field is missing something fundamental about people.