Such firms grow faster and attract more talent people to manage that growth. Despite these benefits however scholars and practitioners have long been critical of the short term focus that often characterizes western managers. In this paper the authors develop and describe a model suggesting that the solution to this seeming paradox lies in the fact that earnings management above a given threshold is relatively harmless but below this threshold it can be disastrous.
The results have important implications
Or understanding managerial incentives and the internal processes that create sustain advantage. Key concepts include The model in this paper reconciles the tension in management scholarship between those who have shown that a focus on managing Algeria Phone Number List earnings is associat with better performance in the capital markets and those who have suggest it may be dangerously short sight. Balancing attention to both short and long term investments may be a critical source of competitive advantage. A key source of above average performance might be the differential ability of firms to create relational contracts that incorporate subjective evaluations of capability.
Author Abstract Much recent work
In strategy and popular discussion suggests that an excessive focus on managing the numbers ―delivering quarterly earnings at the expense of longer term investments―makes it difficult for firms to make the investments necessary to build Arabia Whatsapp Number competitive advantage. Short termism has been blam for everything from the decline of the penetration of techniques such as TQM and continuous improvement. Yet a vigorous tradition in the accounting literature establishes that firms routinely sacrifice long term investment to manage earnings and are reward for doing so.
